Maryland
Assessment

Procedures
Manual

CATEGORY:

VALUATION

014

SUBJECT:

Contaminated Property

140

TOPIC:

Required Documentation

010

Date Issued
4/11/94

Revision #

 

001: Procedures
004: Owners
008: Taxable Property
009: Exemptions
012: Credits
014: Valuation
018: Operating Property
of Utilities and Railroads
019: Real Property
029: Notices
045: Assessment Records
067: Allowances and
Removal
229: Maryland Tax Court
232: Administration
255: Appeals
300: Triennial Assessments
350: Personal Property
375: Personal Property
 
Alphabetical Index
Numerical Index
 

 

Environmental contamination is a problem that has been addressed by the "Standard on the Valuation of Property Affected by Environmental Contamination" issued by the International Association of Assessing Officers. This standard is recognized as being advisory in nature, but certain provisions are indispensable when dealing with problems of contamination. It is recommended that you review this standard when you are confronted with specific valuation problems associated with contamination.

The presence of contamination is a problem that may have an adverse impact on property value. Numerous ways for recognizing this loss of value are discussed within the context of the IAAO standard. Generally, these approaches vary with regard to the nature and extent of the contamination. The dollar cost and time frame associated with the clean-up requirements are also concerns that will help quantify any loss in value.

When dealing with a specific contamination issue, it is necessary to develop documentation that shows the nature of the problem. The following information must be provided by the property owner.

  1. The specific problem must be identified. The extent of this problem should be substantiated by the records of the Maryland Department of Environment. It may be helpful for the assessor to contact the Department of Environment in this regard but it should be viewed as the property owner's responsibility to provide this documentation.
  2. Estimates regarding the cost to cure the problem must also be provided. Such estimates are most reliable when they are supported by a consulting report or work estimate submitted by a competent Environmental Engineering Firm.
  3. Estimates as to the time frame necessary to accomplish the clean-up may also be considered.
  4. Monitoring or stabilization cost should also be quantified.

With this information it is possible to quantify the loss in value that results from the contamination. In most instances the cost to cure the problem will serve as a basis for measuring the value that is lost due to the problem. Such cost can be discounted where there is a prolonged clean-up period or where clean-up can be delayed.

In some cases the cost to correct the problem, even after adjusted for time, will exceed the market value of the property. It may be appropriate in such cases to assign a minimal or zero value to the property. Documentation must be retained with the property record file when this occurs.

When the property continues to be used, despite the contamination problem, there may be value-in-use that should be recognized in the assessment of the property. Whenever a value-in-use approach is adopted, it should be clearly defined as such throughout the appeal process.

SDAT Home
Previous Next Updates